interesting... 90% + 50% = 140% you have more visitors than you can LOL!!! amazing
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote: > In our random sampling of our website visitors, we have about 90% with > .NET 3.5 and about 50% with .NET 4. > > It doesn't seem like the time is right to force the transition to .NET > 4. The only significant benefit I'm personally aware of is the use of > ISet. > > Patrick Earl > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> wrote: > > NH (even now) will of course *run* under .NET 4 but I think Fabio's > comment > > was more about taking a *required* dependency on .NET 4. Doing so is a > > non-trivial choice whose benefits (any new NH features that would be > > possible under .NET 4 but not under .NET 3.5) have to outweigh its costs > > (restricting the pool of potential adopters to only those able to > deploy/run > > .NET 4). > > > > Steve Bohlen > > [email protected] > > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > > http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Michael DELVA <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Why wouldn't you be able to go to .NET4? > > > -- Fabio Maulo
