I think the numbers are sensible enough to me. That would mean 90% visitors
have .NET 3.5 only installed and 50% visitors have both .NET 3.5 and 4
installed. The 50% is only the subset of 90%.





-- 
Regards,

Maximilian Haru Raditya




On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:

> that mean:
> 90% - 50% = 40% on .NET3.5
>
> And I can see something more than ISet as:
> dynamic-entities
> dynamic-components
> Parallel to hydrate the result of a Multiquery (Multiquery in its large
> meaning)
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> haha... ya... it's more like 3.5 is the 3.5 or later number.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > interesting... 90% + 50% = 140%
>> > you have more visitors than you can LOL!!!
>> > amazing
>> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In our random sampling of our website visitors, we have about 90% with
>> >> .NET 3.5 and about 50% with .NET 4.
>> >>
>> >> It doesn't seem like the time is right to force the transition to .NET
>> >> 4.  The only significant benefit I'm personally aware of is the use of
>> >> ISet.
>> >>
>> >>          Patrick Earl
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> > NH (even now) will of course *run* under .NET 4 but I think Fabio's
>> >> > comment
>> >> > was more about taking a *required* dependency on .NET 4.  Doing so is
>> a
>> >> > non-trivial choice whose benefits (any new NH features that would be
>> >> > possible under .NET 4 but not under .NET 3.5) have to outweigh its
>> costs
>> >> > (restricting the pool of potential adopters to only those able to
>> >> > deploy/run
>> >> > .NET 4).
>> >> >
>> >> > Steve Bohlen
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com
>> >> > http://twitter.com/sbohlen
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Michael DELVA <
>> [email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why wouldn't you be able to go to .NET4?
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Fabio Maulo
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Fabio Maulo
>
>

Reply via email to