No, I'm behind in tasks for this weekend (which, sadly, is nearly at an end <g>). I'm planning to make these edits first thing tomorrow morning. I will post a msg here once its complete just so that everyone can know its done.
Steve Bohlen [email protected] http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com http://twitter.com/sbohlen On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote: > Has this happened yet? I don't see any indication of this on JIRA, > though I didn't actually push the "submit" button on the create issue > page to see if there was an error. > > Patrick Earl > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> wrote: > > lol -- suppose I should read my OWN email :) > > > > Thanks~! :P > > > > Steve Bohlen > > [email protected] > > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > > http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Richard Brown (gmail) > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > ... but please let me know if anyone has any compelling reason NOT to > >> > proceed ... > >> > >> +1 from me btw ... I only didn’t respond cos you asked if anyone knew of > a > >> reason “not” to go ahead. > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Stephen Bohlen > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 3:37 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Cc: Fabio Maulo > >> Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] Proposal: "ARCHIVE" NHLQ project > >> > >> OK, its been several days and while we've not heard from EVERYONE on > this, > >> those that have provided input have agreed with this proposed approach > so > >> this coming weekend I will proceed to make these changes as described. > >> > >> Thanks everyone who weighed in. > >> > >> Steve Bohlen > >> [email protected] > >> http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > >> http://twitter.com/sbohlen > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> agree. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> All: > >>>> > >>>> As a follow on to several of the suggestions over the months re: how > to > >>>> avoid erroneous reporting of issues for the NHibernate LINQ provider > under > >>>> the (deprecated) NHLQ project instead of under the LINQ component > under NH, > >>>> I am seriously considering 'archiving' the JIRA for NHLQ (effectively, > >>>> changing its 'public' permissions to read-only as suggested here > >>>> http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRA-13087 and elsewhere in response > to > >>>> similar situations). Core committers would retain full edit perms > under > >>>> this approach, but everyone else would be reduced to read-only for the > NHLQ > >>>> area of JIRA. > >>>> > >>>> Since (nearly) all issues reported under NHLQ are being met with > either > >>>> "this is solved with the new LINQ provider in the core of NH3.x" or > "can you > >>>> please re-post your issues under the LINQ component of the JIRA for > the core > >>>> NH project?", this seems the simplest thing to do in order to avoid > any > >>>> additional erroneous issue reporting under the 'wrong' JIRA project. > The > >>>> most recent issue opened under NHLQ ( > http://216.121.112.228/browse/NHLQ-99) > >>>> probably also satisfies this same criteria. > >>>> > >>>> I can't see any reason anyone would object to this move, but please > let > >>>> me know if anyone has any compelling reason NOT to proceed in this > manner. > >>>> Otherwise, I will proceed as outlined here early next week. > >>>> > >>>> Steve Bohlen > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > >>>> http://twitter.com/sbohlen > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Fabio Maulo > >>> > >> > > >
