Couple tiny things.
1. Does this also prevent comments from regular users? (I ask because
I'm hoping it does)
2. You used NHQL in one place on the project description instead of NHLQ.
Patrick Earl
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> wrote:
> All:
>
> This task is now COMPLETED as follows:
>
> a new Permissions scheme called 'Archived' has been created with the group
> 'jira-developers' replacing the permissions that were previously assigned to
> the 'jira-users' group (this will, in effect, prevent anyone NOT an NH dev
> from doing anything other than read-only under this permissions scheme)
> the 'Archived' Permission scheme has been applied to the NHLQ project
> the Description for the NHLQ project has been modified to reflect notice
> that the project is deprecated (http://216.121.112.228/browse/NHLQ) and
> where to go to report new issues for the NH LINQ provider if issues persist
> after upgrading to NH3.x or later
> (http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH/component/10120)
>
> This *should* solve the issue of ppl reporting issues under NHLQ, but since
> *most* ppl on this dev list are in the group 'jira-developers' most of us
> won't experience any change in perms when accessing JIRA. But this should
> prevent any NEW issues from being reported there moving forward (unless one
> of us want to report one just for fun).
>
> Let me know if there are any problems with these changes as you continue to
> interact with JIRA.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve Bohlen
> [email protected]
> http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com
> http://twitter.com/sbohlen
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> No, I'm behind in tasks for this weekend (which, sadly, is nearly at an
>> end <g>). I'm planning to make these edits first thing tomorrow morning. I
>> will post a msg here once its complete just so that everyone can know its
>> done.
>>
>> Steve Bohlen
>> [email protected]
>> http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com
>> http://twitter.com/sbohlen
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Has this happened yet? I don't see any indication of this on JIRA,
>>> though I didn't actually push the "submit" button on the create issue
>>> page to see if there was an error.
>>>
>>> Patrick Earl
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > lol -- suppose I should read my OWN email :)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks~! :P
>>> >
>>> > Steve Bohlen
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com
>>> > http://twitter.com/sbohlen
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Richard Brown (gmail)
>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > ... but please let me know if anyone has any compelling reason NOT
>>> >> > to
>>> >> > proceed ...
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 from me btw ... I only didn’t respond cos you asked if anyone knew
>>> >> of a
>>> >> reason “not” to go ahead.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> From: Stephen Bohlen
>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 3:37 PM
>>> >> To: [email protected]
>>> >> Cc: Fabio Maulo
>>> >> Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] Proposal: "ARCHIVE" NHLQ project
>>> >>
>>> >> OK, its been several days and while we've not heard from EVERYONE on
>>> >> this,
>>> >> those that have provided input have agreed with this proposed approach
>>> >> so
>>> >> this coming weekend I will proceed to make these changes as described.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks everyone who weighed in.
>>> >>
>>> >> Steve Bohlen
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com
>>> >> http://twitter.com/sbohlen
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> agree.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> All:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> As a follow on to several of the suggestions over the months re: how
>>> >>>> to
>>> >>>> avoid erroneous reporting of issues for the NHibernate LINQ provider
>>> >>>> under
>>> >>>> the (deprecated) NHLQ project instead of under the LINQ component
>>> >>>> under NH,
>>> >>>> I am seriously considering 'archiving' the JIRA for NHLQ
>>> >>>> (effectively,
>>> >>>> changing its 'public' permissions to read-only as suggested here
>>> >>>> http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRA-13087 and elsewhere in response
>>> >>>> to
>>> >>>> similar situations). Core committers would retain full edit perms
>>> >>>> under
>>> >>>> this approach, but everyone else would be reduced to read-only for
>>> >>>> the NHLQ
>>> >>>> area of JIRA.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Since (nearly) all issues reported under NHLQ are being met with
>>> >>>> either
>>> >>>> "this is solved with the new LINQ provider in the core of NH3.x" or
>>> >>>> "can you
>>> >>>> please re-post your issues under the LINQ component of the JIRA for
>>> >>>> the core
>>> >>>> NH project?", this seems the simplest thing to do in order to avoid
>>> >>>> any
>>> >>>> additional erroneous issue reporting under the 'wrong' JIRA
>>> >>>> project. The
>>> >>>> most recent issue opened under NHLQ
>>> >>>> (http://216.121.112.228/browse/NHLQ-99)
>>> >>>> probably also satisfies this same criteria.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I can't see any reason anyone would object to this move, but please
>>> >>>> let
>>> >>>> me know if anyone has any compelling reason NOT to proceed in this
>>> >>>> manner.
>>> >>>> Otherwise, I will proceed as outlined here early next week.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Steve Bohlen
>>> >>>> [email protected]
>>> >>>> http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com
>>> >>>> http://twitter.com/sbohlen
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Fabio Maulo
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>
>
>
