Lazy properties? Isn't that a Castle-only feature? Or does LinFu now support it as well?
Good idea, BTW. Everybody seems happy...how unusual :) On 21 March 2011 08:55, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > for example? > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > > El 20/03/2011, a las 21:40, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> escribió: > > > Fabio, that's a great idea! Thanks for your work on that. > > > > Thanks also to Phillip for the code! > > > > I'll have to try porting my extension to the castle bytecode provider > > over to the NHibernate one. :) > > > > BTW, are there any NHibernate features that the proxy does not support > > at this point? Or have all the appropriate adjustments been made? > > > > Patrick Earl > > > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Work done!!! > >> > >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> This is great news for the improved ease-of-adoption (and packaging > too, > >>> of course) story for NH. Excellent to hear--! > >>> > >>> Steve Bohlen > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > >>> http://twitter.com/sbohlen > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all (team and users). > >>>> I'm happy to announce that, at the end of this month, we have to > release > >>>> NHibernate3.2.0Alpha1. > >>>> For real we can release 3.2.0 as GA but I would take some caution. > >>>> With the release of NHibernate3.2.0Alpha1 we will remove all Bytecode > >>>> providers because we will have our default. > >>>> Each framework, as Castle, LinFu and Spring.NET, can deploy his own > >>>> bytecode provider for NHibernate directly with their packages. > >>>> Have a nice time. > >>>> -- > >>>> Fabio Maulo > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Fabio Maulo > >> > >> >
