I wasn't suggesting either way was right or wrong ... just that the linq2sql behaviour didn't surprise me. I guess it fits my "world view" of how an orm/sql works.
Sent from my Android phone. On 12 Apr 2011 16:33, "Patrick Earl" <[email protected]> wrote: There was a fairly long discussion about null handling earlier on the list, and the general consensus was that == nullVariable should be translated to IS NULL. This is a deviation from Linq to SQL, but in a way that seems to reduce confusion with no increase in complexity. The = NULL semantics are of limited use in practice. Patrick Earl On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Harald Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > Richard wrote: >...
