To try to be more clear... A convention is all ways opinable and we have enough work to do to maintain even our conventions over the default-NH-conventions (property-name = columnName for example).
Perhaps we may includes some default-conventions later (for example many-to-many table = RoleToUser). Thoughts ? On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all. > I'm implementing ConventionModelMapper but I'm a little bit boring > basically because I'm re-implementing re-testing someones of ConfORM > patterns-appliers. > > Do you mind if we release NH3.2 with the ability to implement a Convention > based mapping but without provide real conventions ? > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > -- Fabio Maulo
