Work done http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2011/04/nhibernate-32-mapping-by-code_13.html
<http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2011/04/nhibernate-32-mapping-by-code_13.html>IMO that is all. Now there are some minor things to do with the API as give support to Composite-Id and some other XML minor features On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote: > I generally agree with this as well, that there should be at least one > default convention in a later release. That said, it might be an > uphill battle to get there. My convention is better than your > convention. :P > > It's fine to release without it now. > > Patrick Earl > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > So without any out-of-the-box conventions the primary use-case for this > > feature would be limited to declarative mapping in code (unless the user > > then authored their own conventions of course), is that right --? That > > seems a reasonable starting point for a first release but I think its > > valuable to provide usable out-of-the-box conventions to assist new > adopters > > so I'd recommend that we try to ensure that some conventions make it into > > the very next release. > > > > Steve Bohlen > > [email protected] > > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > > http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> To try to be more clear... > >> A convention is all ways opinable and we have enough work to do to > >> maintain even our conventions over the default-NH-conventions > (property-name > >> = columnName for example). > >> Perhaps we may includes some default-conventions later (for example > >> many-to-many table = RoleToUser). > >> Thoughts ? > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all. > >>> I'm implementing ConventionModelMapper but I'm a little bit boring > >>> basically because I'm re-implementing re-testing someones of ConfORM > >>> patterns-appliers. > >>> Do you mind if we release NH3.2 with the ability to implement a > >>> Convention based mapping but without provide real conventions ? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Fabio Maulo > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Fabio Maulo > >> > > > > > -- Fabio Maulo
