<< I've noticed at least one project that went its own way already. >>
As you probably noticed, Nhibernate Envers moved to bitbucket some months ago. If I've understood this thread correctly, other parts of the community (JIRA, nhforge/wiki, user lists etc) will still be hosted outside github? For sure Envers source code can be moved to github, but if there's no strong opinion against it, I would prefer keeping it at bitbucket for now (it's already been outside the "source code umbrella" for some time now). All the best, Roger -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Patrick Earl Sent: den 6 september 2011 00:15 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] Re: What is the future of NHContrib source code repository? I figured individual maintainers might prefer to take the repositories elsewhere, but if nobody objects, I'm happy to move all of them wholesale. I guess they were originally under the "official umbrella," so it does make some sense to keep them that way. I've noticed at least one project that went its own way already. Are there any objections to moving the whole batch? Patrick Earl On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> wrote: > No concerns, but I would recommend moving the remainder of the > projects over as well so that all is in one place (or at least in the > case of github, one > organization) vs. leaving some at sourceforge and moving others to github. > What's the reasoning behind not simply moving all of nhcontrib > projects over to github authoritatively --? > > Steve Bohlen > [email protected] > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> NHibernate.Search and NHibernate.Validator look like good candidates >> to me. NHibernate.Search hasn't been under active maintenance for a >> while, and NHibernate.Validator has had contributions from Fabio and >> Dario over the past year and a half, but it's apparently slightly out >> of date at the moment. Does anyone have any concerns with moving >> these two over? >> >> Patrick Earl > >
