I was to ask about compile time proxies but i see that it won't probably be possible for you since 1.2.1 issue.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:21 PM, srf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We dont use the Load method and unfortunatly Im currently on > Nhibernate 1.2 and we are having some challenges moving to 2.0 so we > wont be moving to it for a little while so I wont be able to use > stateless session. By the way, do you know where I could get more > information on stateless session and what kinds of things it can do. > For now I suspect I might be out of luck but we are currently looking > at doing heavy redesign and not have nhibernate use our domain objects > and create lightweight entity objects and have a mapper map the entity > objects to our domain objects. The problem is our domain objects are > very heavy weight in that they have data and business functionality > and having nhibernate push around these heavy domain objects seems to > bring about a lot of performance problems. Im not sure if anyone > considered doing this before but it does mean we have to do more work > that nhibernate did for us automatically but if it means better > performance then thats more important for us. > > scott > > On Oct 6, 10:15 pm, "Fabio Maulo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > use statelessSession and don't use Load method. > > > > 2008/10/6 srf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It can be quite a bit since we are doing a lot of data analysis. One > > > example I have is a method called 200,000 times and without the > > > proxies it takes 10,000ms to execute. With the proxy wrappers it takes > > > 190,000ms!! Running it through a profiler found the > > > System.Reflection.MethodBase.Invoke method call is what is killing it. > > > It seems method invokes are VERY!! expensive. At any rate , im first > > > trying to figure out how to turn it off totally but going forward I > > > was looking for alternatives to the castle proxy given that nhibernate > > > 2.0 allows us to substitute our own proxy wrapper so if anyone has > > > tried alternative wrappers that would be great too. > > > > > thanks > > > > > scott > > > > > On Oct 6, 10:51 am, "Tuna Toksöz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > How many times do you need to call those methods? > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:47 PM, srf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Im using the default-lazy=false attribute to totally turn off lazy > > > > > loading in hopes that no proxy wrapping would happen but Im still > > > > > getting castle proxy wrappers being generated. Does anyone know if > > > > > turning off lazy loading will prevent the proxy wrappers from being > > > > > created? I need to do this because of the big performance problem > with > > > > > the castle proxy wrappers given that it uses > > > > > System.Reflection.MethodBase.Invoke to redirect the method calls > and > > > > > using this enough times will cause quite a huge performance hit. So > Im > > > > > trying to for the life of me just turn off the wrappers totally and > I > > > > > cant seem to get that to happen so if anyone could shed some light > on > > > > > this for me , that would be great. > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > scott > > > > > > -- > > > > Tuna Toksöz > > > > > > Typos included to enhance the readers attention! > > > > -- > > Fabio Maulo > > > -- Tuna Toksöz Typos included to enhance the readers attention! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
