All we need (i am talking about just linq) is IQueryable, so can be done, isn't it?
Moreover, one can send Expressions to the dall and do the querying in the DAL, still. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think you _can_ do it at runtime, the compiler has to bind to the > appropriate extension method, no? > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Tuna Toksöz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have no problem with NH, I like it a lot, I even want to carry the names >> on my tshirt so no problem for me. >> >> This can be done at runtime, so no DLL reference for business is really >> required for Linq. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> 2008/10/13 Tuna Toksöz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>>> *When Linq2NH will be ready I'll continue to use it in DataAccess...* >>>> >>>> But if we talk about Linq, it can go in business too, >>>> >>> >>> Are you sure you can do it without add a reference to NHibernate in the >>> business tier ? >>> Are you sure that Linq2NH will look like exactly LINQ2Object with nothing >>> more ? >>> Which will be the QueryContext of a Linq2NH query ? >>> >>> I don't understand who don't want see a reference to NH in the business >>> tier but don't have problem to see System.Data.Linq.DataContext. >>> -- >>> Fabio Maulo >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Tuna Toksöz >> >> Typos included to enhance the readers attention! >> >> >> > > > > -- Tuna Toksöz Typos included to enhance the readers attention! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
