I was under the impression that NHV was some how integrated into the *.hbm files, also since it is called "NHibernate" Validator. I think it makes perfectly sense now not to mix-up NH mapping files with validation mapping files. I'm going to investigate some time into the other frameworks you mentioned.
Thanks a lot!! On 30 apr, 22:11, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Anton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So does that mean that you have to duplicate every mapping file in > > order for it to work?? > > It doesn't make much sense to me to have near identical xml mapping > > files just to make > > validation work. > > "doesn't make much sense" <= is only your point of view. > > I know ppl using: > NH but with Castle.Validation > NH but with VAB > NH but with DataAnnotation > > IMO there is no sense to mix ORM configuration with logical/"physical" > validation stuff. > > To work with NHV I have 0 files and for NH I have at least one application > in production with 0 files and few C# lines. > Series of posts about > NHV:http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/search/label/Validator > Series of post about ConfORM > :http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/search/label/ConfORM > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "nhusers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
