No, NH will not do that.

    Diego


On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 23:57, jimbobmcgee <[email protected]>wrote:

> OK.  I can see possibilities but none quite seem to match.  <any />
> looks like it might come closest (with some changes), but still looks
> like it is going to perform (at least) one SELECT for every <meta-
> value /> it encounters.  <dynamic-component /> also seems very close,
> but would require me to use an IDictionary to store values (where the
> keys map to column names within the one table), rather than to store
> strongly-typed classes that access the values (where the classes are
> persisted to their own tables).  I also assume that <dynamic-
> component /> will try to return all values defined in the mapping, not
> specific ones.
>
> Note that I'm not trying to retrieve sets of data where the properties
> can be different per row, but I am trying to retrieve sets where the
> properties could be different per set.
>
> Allowing me to return, fleetingly, to pseudo-code examples (note the /
> psuedo/ aspect here), I am after a means to specify what I want to
> return, have NHibernate generate the SQL to do so and populate the
> component objects for me.
>
> (new CompObj()).GetByID(1) returns:
>    SELECT id
>    FROM comp_objs
>    WHERE oid = 1
>
> (new CompObj(new Positional())).GetByID(1) returns:
>    SELECT id, x, y
>    FROM comp_objs t1
>    LEFT JOIN pos_objs t2 ON t1.oid = t2.oid
>    WHERE t1.oid = 1
>
> (new CompObj(new Positional(), new Colored())).GetByID(1) returns:
>    SELECT id, x, y, r, g, b
>    FROM comp_objs t1
>    LEFT JOIN pos_objs t2 ON t1.oid = t2.oid
>    LEFT JOIN col_objs t3 ON t1.oid = t3.oid
>    WHERE t1.oid = 1
>
> This does not seem unrealistic to me.  Is such generation/mapping
> possible within NHibernate?
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2:56 am, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > NH can support most models based on sane inheritance and composition.
> > It's hard to tell which parts are requirements and which are just
> > implementation ideas... but you can definitely map a CompositeObject
> which
> > has a set or map of inherited CompositeObjects, for example.
> >
> >     Diego
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 22:38, jimbobmcgee <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> > > I appreciate that it may look like I'm asking a lot but I'm not asking
> > > as much as you might first think; it's just a little tough for me to
> > > conceptualise without some rudamentary example of what I am trying to
> > > achieve (hence the extensive code snippets).  I've got the
> > > architecture and design down (at least conceptually), now I'm looking
> > > to see how I might leverage NHibernate given that concept.
> >
> > > Now, let me see if I can distill the concept/question into something
> > > wih a couple less paragraphs:
> >
> > > Given an outer POCO object, with a collection member, where each item
> > > of the collection is a different inner POCO object (i.e. stored in
> > > different tables) that has a one-to-one relationship with the outer
> > > POCO (enforced by foreign primary keys), is there a way to configure
> > > NHibernate either so that it understands the join or that it will
> > > generate the SQL to query it, without the specific content of the
> > > collection member being known at design time?
> >
> > > (Now, to me the above question seems harder to understand than that
> > > with the examples...)
> >
> > > Your answer, 'probably not', is most likely the correct one, in which
> > > case NHibernate would not be suited for my specific needs.  That's no
> > > biggie, it just means I won't be able to use it.  I'm not trying to
> > > shoehorn in NHibernate where it will not fit, merely evaluating it
> > > considering my needs.  If it were a specific issue I was addressing,
> > > I'm sure I could RTFM; the documentation is hardly incomplete and
> > > there are a wealth of articles out there covering many basic mapping
> > > issues.  But having spent a couple of evenings Googling and not being
> > > able to break the question down into terse, boolean logic, I thought
> > > I'd try a higher form of human language interpretation.
> >
> > > (And, of course, if I were required to use NHibernate and required to
> > > use composite objects, I would consider consulting hours from an
> > > expert NH developer; but for a proof-of-concept piece, not likely).
> >
> > > On Aug 3, 1:32 am, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 19:03, jimbobmcgee <
> [email protected]
> > > >wrote:
> >
> > > > > A colleague of mine has been trying to convince me to use
> NHibernate
> > > > > in an upcoming project ...
> >
> > > > > [...unhelpful critique...]
> >
> > > > > Semantics aside, do you think this is something NHibernate could
> help
> > > > > me achieve?  If so, what do you think would be the most elegant way
> to
> > > > > do it?
> >
> > > > Yes... No... Maybe.
> > > > Probably not.
> >
> > > > In any case (leaving acid humor aside for a second) you are asking
> for
> > > > architecture, design, guidance, and implementation all at once in a
> > > single
> > > > email.
> > > > We can help you with specific issues ("does NH support composite
> keys?"
> > > "how
> > > > do I eagerly load two collections?", "how would you map this
> inheritance
> > > > structure?")
> > > > If you need more than that, you should buy some consulting hours from
> any
> > > of
> > > > the expert NH developers around here.
> >
> > > >     Diego
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "nhusers" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> >
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to