Use SQL
Diego
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 23:14, jimbobmcgee <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2:47 am, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If they are related and you want to tream them as such, make them related
> in
> > the model.
>
> I can't. It violates the requirement I have been given. Whether you
> agree with the requirement or not, you surely have to concede that if
> the requirement is there then it must be met, else you don't get paid.
>
> How can one make a extension model if every time you want to add an
> extension you have to change the base to know about the extension? By
> that definition, the only way I can conceive doing that would require
> a source branching strategy. Source branching strategies are not code
> and cannot be tested as code. And do not meet the requirement.
>
> On Aug 9, 2:47 am, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You say "the IDs are the same, which means there is an obvious left-join
> > that can be made" but provide no way for NH to know that.
>
> And therein lies the rub. I know they are. You can see from the code
> that they are. They are because the 'contract' says that must be and
> a database foreign key constraint says that they will be. Why can I
> not tell NHibernate that they are? Why should NHibernate even care?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
