Is the caching done to improve performance of for business logic or done to speed up data passthrough to a front-end? If it is the last scenario then you are probably better of with a caching solution that does its job way earlier then at the point where the data would be retrieved from the database. For example, output caching.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:48 PM, StuS <[email protected]> wrote: > I've read that we can't use 2nd level caching until we use (explicit) > transactions - however, we are using a an Informix system - which for > reasons currently beyond our control; an accounting system - we cannot use > transactions until we move to SQL server. > > Second level caching could greatly improve our performance by cache data > that doesn't changed often - is there any way at all to use it with > implicit transactions? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
