It will initially be done to speed up business logic, and data available to that logic
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:04:32 PM UTC+1, Ramon Smits wrote: > > Is the caching done to improve performance of for business logic or done > to speed up data passthrough to a front-end? If it is the last scenario > then you are probably better of with a caching solution that does its job > way earlier then at the point where the data would be retrieved from the > database. For example, output caching. > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:48 PM, StuS <> wrote: > >> I've read that we can't use 2nd level caching until we use (explicit) >> transactions - however, we are using a an Informix system - which for >> reasons currently beyond our control; an accounting system - we cannot use >> transactions until we move to SQL server. >> >> Second level caching could greatly improve our performance by cache data >> that doesn't changed often - is there any way at all to use it with >> implicit transactions? >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/GJGSEQegyF4J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
