> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 16:13:07 PST
> From: "kp foo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: tokina 400 f5.6 [v04.n231/11]
> Message: 11
>
> Saw your reference to Moose's comments and his recommendation of the
> Tokina 400 f5.6. Be careful, take all Moose has to say with the fact
> that he is sponsored by Tokina.
I'm not going to dispute the sponsorship, but if you go to his
webpage, and work your way to the "free" copy of the "BT Journal"
that is available for download in PDF format, and read that issue
(Vol3, I), there is a short article he wrote comparing the Sigma
400/5.6 Macro AF and the Tokina 400/5.6 ATX. He explains that the
factors for him switching are that the Tokina is faster to AF, and
it's noticeably lighter than the Sigma (990g v. 1445g).
Regards,
Chris
--
You can take the naming as far as you want. | Christopher Somers
Some of the most enjoyable things -- | Rise Technology
the way the water folds itself | www.rise.com
around that rock and drops away -- +-----------------------------
have no names. -> Barry Lopez | Gallery: www.flash.net/~jboy
