Eertmans Nicolas wrote:
>There isn't but the closest thing to that is a slide/film scanner. With
>such a scanner, you get the best of both worlds. The silver film still
>has the edge in picture quality, and is the cheapest and easiest image
>storage medium, while the quality of a film scanner, even the cheapest,
>outperforms all but the highest end digital cameras.
>All you loose is the ability to use your image electronically within
>minutes after the picture taking.
Thanks for your reply. I checked http://www.imagek.com/index.shtml and
it looks very well. Hope they keep on working, it must be a bomb!
A digital slide scanner is not the way I want to go because I have to
make the slides first. Also for for testing purposes a "digital film
pack" would be nice and worth the $800 they mentioned on their web page.
Oliver
