> How do you know that it's faster? There are quite a lot of benchmarks where > Nim can beat Rust.
I say it base on: * <https://programming-language-benchmarks.vercel.app/nim-vs-rust> * <https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks> Most benchmark show Rust is faster. As Rust doesn't have GC, it should be also faster in theory. Maybe exists some benchmark where Nim is better than Rust, but I think maybe it is because implementation, algorithm and compilation used by Nim is optimized, and no for Rust. But it is not because the language is faster. > Writing a Nim wrapper of a C library is even easier, and C "ecosystem" is > much bigger than Rust's :) Yes, I ask for Rust because Rust library is more safer. So, I don't know, if write wrapper is easily in Nim. Why it exist still some pure Nim library with same feature than libraries in C or Rust ecosystem? Why developer don't focus the effort to improve the Nim tooling ecosystem, instead of spend time to develop a existing feature in other ecosystem.
