> At my job I have to learn Rust. I was just now reading about cxxbridge and > bindgen, two of the (multiple) tools Rust developers have to create bindings > for C/C++. This is a common thing to do in Rust, and it inevitably means that > one exposes oneself "to all the bugs that can arise from those languages > (either by yourself, or through a wrapper)." On this score, Rust is no safer > than Nim.
Yes, but Rust have a better memory safety and a safer type system than Nim. A Nim wrapper around Rust should be reliable, I guess. So Why developer don't focus the effort to improve the Nim tooling ecosystem, instead of spend time to develop a existing feature in Rust ecosystem, a Rust wrapper should solve the problem?
