> I think your initial wording "misleading and dangerous" was not that good.
I didn't even write that 😒 I couldn't be more neutral, honestly. It is misinformation because it's inaccurate and it is dangerous because it has to do with a very sensitive topic with regard to programming languages: someone might even not consider a lang if it's not 1.0 yet. It was never my goal to offend anyone. I was pointing out to a major inaccuracy published on a _[new](https://forum.nim-lang.org/postActivity.xml#new) website about Nim.
