In fact, \--clang.cpp.options.linker = "-Oz -s ASM_JS=1 --separate-asm" would do as well, if not for the dots in the option name. Options without dots will be configured ina way that is almost equal to nim.cfg
- should we deprecate nim.cfg in favor of config.nims format? timothee
- Re: should we deprecate nim.cfg in favor of config.nim... moigagoo
- Re: should we deprecate nim.cfg in favor of config... kaushalmodi
- Re: should we deprecate nim.cfg in favor of co... dom96
- Re: should we deprecate nim.cfg in favor o... juancarlospaco
- Re: should we deprecate nim.cfg in fa... gemath
- Re: should we deprecate nim.cfg i... andrea
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... gemath
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... andrea
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... arnetheduck
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... andrea
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... juancarlospaco
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... Araq
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... timothee
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... LeuGim
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... gemath
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... timothee
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... Araq
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... gemath
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... timothee
- Re: should we deprecate nim.c... cdome
