Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
> ;; Announcement.                                         -*- scheme -*-
>
> (define guix
>   (package
>     (name "guix")
>     (version "0.1")                               ; first alpha release
>     (source
>       (origin
>         (method url-fetch)
>         (uri "ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-0.1.tar.gz";)
>         (signature "ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-0.1.tar.gz.sig";)
>         (sha256
>          "350286bcf37a4035244cdddfe7bd62e79bcd08db0ed35b48e1444302dfc52005")))
>     (license gpl3+)
>     (home-page "http://www.gnu.org/software/guix/";)
>     (synopsis "Functional package management for GNU")
>     (description
>      "GNU Guix is a functional package manager and associated free
> software distribution of the GNU system.
> (..)
> See the ROADMAP and TODO files for future directions.  Building the
> distribution is a cooperative effort, and you are invited to join!")))

I like the ROADMAP/TODO and could imagine joining the effort.

What are your thoughts on generating nix expressions from guix
expressions for the purpose of package definition?

-- 
Florian Friesdorf <f...@chaoflow.net>
  GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D  BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083
Jabber/XMPP: f...@chaoflow.net
IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC

Attachment: pgpRSEMBCMuQb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Reply via email to