Thus I'd appreciate more info about
- why you go this way. One reason I can think of is because scheme might
be more powerful than nix language. Are there more reasons?
- in which way you're going to utilize the new "power" of scheme first
applying to what problems?
- how exactly you reuse existing "nix*" software. You should describe
this.
- what would be the advantages of your system - eg will you keep the
lazy feature? If you build 150 packages its not a big problem.
But if you think about all python, perl, scala, java, php, C, ocaml,
perl, ... packages ... there are many.
Marc Weber
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
