On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 23:31:42 -0400 Daniel Peebles <pumpkin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've had a sudden urge to do some Haskell archeology and that led me > to a question about how we feel "philosophically" about keeping > abandoned projects and old versions of live projects in nixpkgs. I think it's a very good idea, but ... > How do people feel about this? Is it something I should maintain > independently of nixpkgs or does it belong in the main repo? ... please keep it out of the main Nixpkgs, at least for now. Reason is that currently Nix performance drops linearly with the number of packages. Until we have a caching solution of some sort, I'd prefer to keep Nixpkgs slim. Greets, Ertugrul -- Ertugrul Söylemez <ert...@gmx.de> _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
