This just popped up on /. (as im sure many of you frequent the page also..) it seems to fit in line with this thread..
http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/08/11/07/1535235.shtml On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:21 AM, t35t0r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 1. VMWare isn't open source. It's the hands-down leader in > > We used VMWare Workstation to virtualize WinXP in RHEL5 for one of our > clients. Helped him to kill two birds with one stone. > > > 2. Xen. I am mostly familiar with Xen on Fedora/CentOS/RHEL. It's > > quite nice. I use it quite a lot at home and with the Fedora Project. > > Upsides: > > I rarely use any GUIs and thought I would have to do lots of reading > and look at howtos for getting a VM setup using free tools under Linux > but virt-manager made it very easy under CentOS. Now if GFS2 was as > easy to setup and if we had the money for hardware based fencing > solutions then we could exploit Xen's migration features. > > > Downsides > > The network performance isn't what I was expecting even after > allocating a separate NIC for the VM. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
