How exactly could this happen in the real world? I imagine that the most recently attached drive would be considered the master by the RAID controller and would be used to rebuild the other drive, but I'm just guessing since that seems to be the logical thing to do.
Chris On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Richard Thomas <r...@dicksonlife.com>wrote: > I couldn't find an answer to this, possibly because it would be a retarded > thing to do but I was just wondering... > > Say you had mirrored (say hardware) RAID with two drives. Reboot the system > with one drive unplugged, make some changes then reboot with the other > unplugged (and the unplugged one plugged back in), make some different > changes then reboot with both drives plugged back in, what is the expected > outcome (or is it controller dependent). > > Rich > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NLUG" group. > To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<nlug-talk%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
