On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Dagmar d'Surreal <evildag...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 21:59 -0600, andrew mcelroy wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:54 PM, David R. Wilson <da...@wwns.com> > > wrote: > > Yup. Stole if fair and square. Just go ask the SCO guys > > about it :-). > > > > I think novell had something to say about that > > No, I really do mean it's based on the same stuff. I vaguely remember > at one point seeing a ML discussion where someone was pooh-poohing some > of the Linux code in favor of their BSD box and had a kernel dev come > down on them to the effect of "They're the same code, you fool--it was > ported into Linux". > I think you are referring to nfs in glibc. Oracle finally granted gpl status for it. Technically glibc wasn't fully gpl up until late last year. http://slashdot.org/story/10/08/26/2339249/Glibc-Is-Finally-Free-Software Andrew McElroy > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NLUG" group. > To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
