On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I'm led to believe is that CamelCase is the convention for artifacts, > and that NUnit might be an exception. For that reason, I have > <finalName>nunit.framework</finalName> in the POM rather than break the > convention on the artifact ID. > > Is everyone ok with: > * CamelCase as the convention for artifact IDs > * using finalName for NUnit rather than changing the artifact ID > * selection of (b) below
I think we should respect the name of the artifact as shipped by NUnit (and installed into the GAC by the NUnit installer). Otherwise when NMaven tries to import a project and searches the repository based on the reference in the project file, it isn't going to find a match. In Java most things are lowercase-with-dashes, but a few artifacts like UMLGraph aren't. -- Wendy
