Good point.
Any other opinions on this? Either way, nunit is going to be an anomaly.
- Brett
On 31/10/2008, at 10:27 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What I'm led to believe is that CamelCase is the convention for
artifacts,
and that NUnit might be an exception. For that reason, I have
<finalName>nunit.framework</finalName> in the POM rather than break
the
convention on the artifact ID.
Is everyone ok with:
* CamelCase as the convention for artifact IDs
* using finalName for NUnit rather than changing the artifact ID
* selection of (b) below
I think we should respect the name of the artifact as shipped by NUnit
(and installed into the GAC by the NUnit installer). Otherwise when
NMaven tries to import a project and searches the repository based on
the reference in the project file, it isn't going to find a match.
In Java most things are lowercase-with-dashes, but a few artifacts
like UMLGraph aren't.
--
Wendy
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
