Simon Burge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If not the GPL, what other open source license would be most appropriate? X
> > License? Apache License? BSD License? Artistic License? Others...?
>
> BSD is reasonably common, and fairly free with the adversting clause
> (the old "Clause 3") removed.
Oh yeah, the advertising issue. Is the "Clause 3"-less version a standard
variant of the BSD license (e.g. does it have a name?), or is that just
something that a lot of people do when they make their own derivative of it?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless | To prevent SPAM contamination, please
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW. Thank you.
