On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 11:06:58PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> Digital UNIX still (as of 4.0D) bundles a version of mh. As an
> OpenBSD developer, I'd really like to *not* see nmh GPL'd. Without
> getting into a huge religious war I see no compelling reason that
> nmh needs the 'protections' the GPL provides. A simple licence
> that says 'you can't claim this work as your own and you can't sue
> the authors' if my license of choice. In other words, a BSD/MIT
> style license.
I thought all software needs to be protected from: our engineers are
busy with working on other stuff, and fixing this bug is not top
priority, since we did not have many people complaining about it.
So what if the nmh team GPL nmh, and makes binary distributions for
all platforms that do not include nmh with the system?
Mate
---
Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
