> Having a bit of trouble parsing this; didn't get Josh's note for some reason.
> Are you wanting RC4 called 1.2, or are you wanting the eventual release called
> 1.2? I pulled the 1.1 file from the web site yesterday because Ken told me
> that it had problems and that the only reason that it was up there was because
> it was too much trouble to take it down.
RC4 is supposed to lead up to version 1.1. Since there is already a
tarball called 1.1 floating around, I think you should turn 1.1-RC4 into
1.2-RC4, then call the formal release 1.2. You can see the confusion this
has already created and there isn't even a release yet.
> A general comment here... it's really hard to make some types of changes on
> savannah. For example, they have to take files down; maintainers can't do it
> themselves. So if there are any issues with naming or content let's get them
> hashed out in advance. I've heard from very few folks since heading down this
> path and will be less sympathetic to complaints that come in after the fact.
Then don't make such changes. Start your tenure out with a release called
1.2. That puts all previous versions in the past, with no potential for
confusion. Heck, you could get all modern and call it nmh2005 ;)
--
JB
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
