On 28 Sep, Harald Geyer wrote: > > If you are going to apply my patch then please also apply the changes > proposed by Robert Elz. Other than that I don't know of any issues. > I'm using it since I posted it to the list. Don't know whether anybody > else is testing it too.
I heard no complaints so I've applied the patch (+ proposed changes) and backed out the old workaround. It'd be good if you can check that what I put in CVS is correct. Can we perhaps sort out giving CVS access to some more of the people that have written patches recently? I don't mind clearing a backlog of patches but I don't want to be dealing with all future patches. And as this vfork issue has shown, it is very difficult to fully understand all the patches. Oliver This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
