> >Am I dinosaur for still using procmail?? > >I mean, is there something better? > >If not, does anyone have patches for logging e.g. date, from, to? > >OMG, it just occurred to me: maybe it's INFERIOR to slocal these days!?!? > >:) > > No patch needed. > > >From my .procmailrc (The first LOG call is to get an empty line > between entries): > > > LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/log > LOG=" > " > > [...] > > # > # Log date > # > DATE=`/bin/date` > LOG="$DATE > "
I'm mostly interested in answering the question "which folder did the recent msg FROM so-and-so@somewhere go into?" So, really, I still think a patch is needed. I just pinged the procmail ML. Earl's URL... http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/procmail ...works. The Google found address... procmail-requ...@informatik.rwth-aachen.de ...did not (bounced "over quota".) Regardless, I have queued up this winter break and/or a snow storm. It's pretty clear glancing at the code that this isn't possible. [BTW, in the procmail ML archives I stumbled on a discussion for "modern" replacements and it seems there's isn't one. Appearently "maildrop" comes close but doesn't allow for e.g. rewritting Subject, IIRC.] steve -- _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
