+1 too. >>> Anything that works in terms of lines is outdated at this point.
Eek! (Squealing like a mouse in the inside.) steve -- On Sat, Nov 24 2012 at 9:40am PST, P Vixie <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. Anything that works in terms of lines is outdated at this point. > > Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Ralph pointed out earlier that with the proliferation of RFC > >2047-encoded > >headers, pick is much less useful. > > > >I'm wondering ... would it make sense to simply have pick run the RFC > >2047 > >decoder on headers before matching them? As far as I can tell we can > >decode all headers except for Received: headers. Thoughts? > > > >--Ken > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Nmh-workers mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers > > -- > Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > _______________________________________________ > Nmh-workers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
