On 24 November 2012 at 9:52, Bill Wohler <[email protected]> wrote: > Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> writes: > > Ralph pointed out earlier that with the proliferation of RFC 2047-encoded > > headers, pick is much less useful. > > > > I'm wondering ... would it make sense to simply have pick run the RFC 2047 > > decoder on headers before matching them? As far as I can tell we can > > decode all headers except for Received: headers. Thoughts? > > Header fields should be RFC 2047-decoded before any MH operation that > considers the content of the message, including pick, shouldn't they?
One more here concurring about the headers. This begs the question about "-search pattern", where "pattern" is what the reader sees. But, "pattern" could also be obfuscated by quoted-printable or html message content. FWIW, I scripted a multi-folder pick, which I call pickf. If pick is going to be altered, then being able to specify multiple folders would be a nice feature addition, at least for me. I guess I just suggested a boat load of work. Sorry 'bout that. Cheerio.... -- Kevin _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
