>i think we should keep doing it. a decent sshd or telnetd could signal a
>buffer flush to the remote end using the tcp urgent pointer.

Hm, I see that a tcflush() may make it to the other end of a pseudo-tty,
assuming it's in packet mode, so in theory it could work out.  Ok, then
I vote for leaving it in there; at worst it does no harm.

--Ken

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Reply via email to