Ken Hornstein writes: > >Gave this a bit more thought. What *exactly* is the issue? Is it a lack of > >confidence that attach will do the *right thing* and the desire to check and > >change it if desired? > > No, I read it as people are suggesting to solve the mime/attach conflict > to change attach to appending mhbuild directives to the message body (I > believe that is bad idea, for reasons enumerated before). > > I will note one thing: I discovered recently that mutt supports an > "Attach" header, which does exactly what you'd expect it to do. So there > is prior art here. > > --Ken
Humph! Have to check the logs, I thought that I was the prior art. Humbug. Jon _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
