>I did a make clean because I wanted to remove all the object files to >compile with possibly different shared libraries -- when trying to use >nmh after an update this morning, it could not load some shared library >and so I thought to do make clean and then ./configure and then make, >but I guess for your software that is not correct.
I'm trying to understand the sequence here, because this is confusing. You _had_ a working 1.6 tree, but it broke because of an upgrade on your side? That wasn't really explained. I can understand doing a 'make clean' in that case, but it first sounded like you downloaded the tar file, ran configure, make clean, make. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
