Ralph wrote: > +1. The `Forward' header is grabbing another one for nmh's use, in > addition to the existing `Attach'. Should we be using `Nmh-Forward' if > the user isn't likely to have the hassle of typing them most of the > time?
Absolutely. The existing code allows either Nmh-Attach or Attach. We should use only Nmh-Forward here. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
