In the message dated: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:28:33 -0400, The pithy ruminations from David Levine on <Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)> were: => Ken wrote: =>
=> => > I don't see the value of having a special Nmh- prefix. => => Traceability is valuable. Agreed. => => > If they happen to leak out in the wild, => > they won't harm anything since they're not official headers. => => The won't harm anything, but how will Ralph know who to ask to fix it? => => Does anyone manually insert "Attach:" into their draft messages? Yes, but rarely....so rarely that I could easily stop if the header prefix changed. Mark => => David => => _______________________________________________ => Nmh-workers mailing list => Nmh-workers@nongnu.org => https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers => -- Mark Bergman Biker, Rock Climber, SCUBA Diver, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stage hand '94 Yamaha GTS1000A^1 2015 Aprilia Capo nord berg...@panix.com https://www.flickr.com/photos/rm sppu http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=bergman%40panix.com I want a newsgroup with a infinite S/N ratio! Now taking CFV on: rec.motorcycles.stagehands.pet-bird-owners.pinballers.unix-supporters 15+ So Far--Want to join? Check out: http://www.panix.com/~bergman _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
