Thus said David Levine on Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:16:38 -0400: > "X-" headers are deprecated by RFC 6648. We could add, say, a Mailer > header.
While the RFC does say this: 3. SHOULD NOT prefix their parameter names with "X-" or similar constructs. Why? What's wrong with "X-"? If the intent of RFC 6648 is to do away with any special interpretation of "X-" in headers, then why make such a statement thus giving a new special interpretation of "X-"? Shouldn't "X-" be just as useable as any other prefix in a header post-RFC6648? Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000000058013656 _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers