Replying to myself, > BTW, RFC 2822 defines Bcc, including that it can remain in the sent > email with no values to indicate to the non-blind recipients that > blinds were sent.
And other programs, like sendmail, handle Bcc headers so that's a case where MH's use does blot out another's use. > So given the only illegal header is `:Forward: +inbox 42', and David's > traceability argument of having the world knock on our door, I think > I'm still in favour of an `Nmh-' prefix. Of course, a UTF-8 prefix is invalid. ;-) -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
