In a message of Mon, 02 Jan 2017 14:59:02 -0500, Ken Hornstein writes: >>I checked. Yes, he did receive a digest at about minight my time. >>So, yeah, that was happening at that time. I still think that 'found >>an error trying to send something --> SAVE THAT DRAFT!!' would be a good >>thing to have. > >Perhaps we didn't explain it very well, but nmh _does_ that. But if one of >the nmh programs crash (which maybe happened because something messed up the >draft file?) then we don't really have the opportunity to do anything at >that point. > >--Ken
But I am correct that nmh saved the file as something that I could have overwritten later using a comp, reply or something like that? What I was suggesting was that, at the point where send (I think) failed, it would be good if nmh made a super-special copy of the draft which, due to its naming wasn't going to be overwritten. Am I asking for the impossible? Laura _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
