Hi David,

> > Something for mhfixmsg(1) to correct?
>
> At this point, I think the trade-off favors manually fixing the
> apparently rare offending messages rather than investing effort in
> enhancing mhfixmsg.

Fair enough.  Either way, I think nmh should baulk at invalid characters
in the MIME type so to avoid creating ‘42.2.*’ as it contains shell
globbing characters.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.

Reply via email to