>Well Ken, we did discuss this a long time ago. I seem to recall that >someone had said that they were gonna redo the scan code as it was full >of DEC-era optimizations. The changes to show would seem to be pretty >easy. Super busy these days but if anyone else felt like working on >it with me I'd think about it. To me it's the flip side of the attachment >code that I wrote 25? years ago; I made it much easier to send attachments >but the receiving end was just too hard with the code base at the time.
Ha! Fair point, and obviously that hasn't happened. The changes to show aren't as easy as you think, because for one you'd have to figure out how to extend m_convert() and the associated data structures to indicate message parts. --Ken
