Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote: > I hate to crap on people, but ... I was curious and I dug back through > things. As far as I can tell:
Thanks for tracking that down.
Please unicast me the original to me... uuencode/zip, whatever.
> - The email header Mike sent out was correct (in that it was formatted
> properly), but it was actually the RFC 2047 encoding of the existing
> encoded RFC 2047 header. As far as I can tell, this is not something
> nmh will ever do as it scans the header and if it doesn't find any
> 8-bit characters it will simply return the original header and I double
> checked this (see the email I mistakenly sent to the list).
NMH + MH-E, yes.
> - As far as I can tell, Mike, you were the originator of this encoding
> and it didn't appear anywhere else before that. I don't know if
Okay.
> It looks like you used MH-E to compose that message, based on:
> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; Emacs 30.1
> So I'd maybe start by looking at MH-E.
Yes.
I'll see if it happens twice.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
