It seems people are preferring JSLint / JSHint over node-lint. Is everyone using node to run JSLint on the command line ?

On 02/24/2012 03:53 AM, Lothar Pfeiler wrote:
I guess, we all agree that for proper QA, somebody else than oneself
should try to read the code and complain if he doesn't understand it.
And I guess, we all agree, that for scripting languages this is even
more relevant than for any compiler language.

If a smart editor tries to do that, or JSLint or JSHint or JSHintLint,
is up to your personal preferences.

These posts about JSLint made me aware of these services and I tried
them out. I pretty much could classify the responses I got. I didn't
change my coding style, and my feelings were never hurt. Currently, I
don't have a team, so, being a lone wolf, it's good to get another
opinion.


On Feb 23, 10:16 pm, Thom Blake<thethombl...@gmail.com>  wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:57 pm, Dean Landolt<d...@deanlandolt.com>  wrote:

Besides, emacs would kindly have underlined that bit in red for me.
(and turned yellow any globals)
That's called a "linter" ;)
Funny, I would have just called it a properly-functioning code
editor.  Besides, the first one is a syntax error - aren't linters for
catching things less obvious than syntax errors?

I'm terribly confused when people say they let stuff like that into
production - "What, you weren't notified of the error as soon as you
typed it?"

--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

Reply via email to