True, that works on this simplified case, but there is more logic,
depending on the cond, etc.
I recall reading a blog post about having async if.
like
if (cond, trueFn, falseFn, doneFn)
That was interesting.
On 08/07/2012 07:47 PM, Mark Volkmann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Dan Milon <danmi...@gmail.com
<mailto:danmi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I am wondering which are the different patterns to handle cases like
var results
if (cond) {
async1(function (err, res) {
results = res
})
}
else {
async2(function (err, res) {
results = res
})
}
// here need to do something with results.
The problem is obvious, but i cannot see any good way to overcome it.
How about this?
var results;
var fn = cond ? async1 : async2;
fn(function (err, res) {
results = res;
// Do something with results here.
});
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
